Comments on: The Blog Turns One

By: Mom

Mom — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:32:51 +0000

Happy late birthday, blog!
I remember that picture and sweater… Yes, Rob, it was a Christmas gift from your cousin. Where did the years go???

By: whitney andersen

whitney andersen — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:41:54 +0000

i prefer the blue cardigan.

By: katie hanna foster

katie hanna foster — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:44:46 +0000

Remember me? I’m Jeff Brown’s neice, Katie. I think we were in charge of taking gifts from people at their wedding…anyway…Your blog is pretty funny! It’s a great read. Also, I have a friend I am going to set you up with. I gave her your blog address to get a sneak peak first, ya know, a girl’s got to have the upper hand.
Let me know if you’re up for a blind date and I’ll get it all set up!

By: Tanya

Tanya — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:13:04 +0000

Rob!!! Thanks for your comment!!! It was awesome!!! P.S. You’re mocking my comments when you get comments like these?!?!?

By: Missy

Missy — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:51:58 +0000

You have weird friends.
Oh, and the photo must have been taken before I accidentally shaved you bald. Who knew I was supposed to put an extension on the hair clippers…?

By: Skeletor

Skeletor — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:46:47 +0000

Get real everyone, deceased supreme court justices strike fear into the hearts of no men! Now, to more pressing matters: if the magic talisman is not delivered to me by midnight I have no choice but to activate the Doomsday Device!

By: robmartin

robmartin — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:59:26 +0000

Slander! Libel! I know for a fact, Mr. Dave Martin (if that is your real name), that said sweater was gifted to me by our cousin for Christmas. Your memory fails you, sir.

By: Dave Martin

Dave Martin — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:43:16 +0000

Guess what Rob? I’m pretty sure that nice red sweater used to be mine…then Steve’s…then yours. There is no doubt that it looked best on me, but I no longer hold the rights to any pictures of me in it!

By: Jack McCoy

Jack McCoy — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:43:30 +0000

Mr. DiMangini, “at least” and “no less than two” are most definitely not “essentially equivalent.”

“At least” means there is a possibility of three, four, five, etc. Rachels reading this blog.
“No less than two” means there cannot be zero or one Rachel reading this blog.

People cannot make rash assumptions and judgments and think they can get away with it scot-free. People die when they don’t think.

Mr. DiMangini, it is very clear that you don’t have a law degree. Maybe you should limit your “representative” business to something of a less vital nature, like dog food or the Snuggie.

By: Justices Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, and Stevens

Justices Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, and Stevens — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:31:18 +0000

Stottlemeyre… do you know about your client’s previous “legal chicanery” against the plaintiff? You should rethink your strategy before wasting our time again. Unless you’re only in it for the money.